Lies and Deception: Defending Your Customers

Lies and Deception: Defending Your Customers

Just because an insurer states something does not mean it’s true.

In this article, we’ll address the real-life issue of outright lies and deceit committed by individuals involved in the collision repair industry…and in this article, it does not pertain to collision repairers.

“Do Unto Others…”

In my role as a consultant to quality-oriented collision repairers, I’m often kept abreast of issues as they arise and how they affect my repairer clients and their customers. Also, I’m kept informed about interactions with insurers relative to repair and total loss settlements.


As much as they might like to, insurers cannot change the rules in the middle of a claim any more than the policyholder can.


In a perfect world, everyone would conduct themselves in an honest and ethical manner and live the old axiom, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” However, as of late, this is all too often not the case when it comes to insurers.

In a recent incident, one of my clients was provided a copy of an e-mail his customer had received from his insurer’s claims manager, which reads as follows (with redactions):

I wanted to introduce myself as I am Jeff’s manager. We have no problem inspecting your vehicle and working with ABC Body Shop. There are some items that you will want to discuss with (the shop’s owner) prior to having him start the estimate of repair:

  • Estimating fee – This will not be a fee paid by (insurer’s name).
  • Storage – This will not be a fee paid unless the vehicle is deemed a total loss by (insurer’s name). Storage will be paid from the time the vehicle is deemed a total loss and not prior. This only comes into play if the vehicle damage is severe enough to deem the vehicle a total loss.
  • Cleaning of vehicle – This is a fee not paid by (insurer’s name).
  • Cleaning of bay – This fee will not be paid by (insurer’s name).
  • Disassembly of vehicle – Jeff will need to meet with (shop owner) and agree on the amount of disassembly needed to properly assess the damages These are just some of the costs that have been disputed in the past, so we are making you aware that these types of charges are a cost of doing business and will not be paid by (insurer’s name).

If ABC Body Shop requests these type of fees, we will be notifying you and they will need to be paid by you at the time of pickup. Once we have completed our estimate, we will notify you of any other differences so you can be prepared for them at the time of vehicle completion. As Jeff stated before, you have the right to choose any collision center to repair your vehicle, and we will do our best to minimize any out-of-pocket expenses you may be charged.

To many, this would likely carry some weight and draw concern for both the customer and repairer. However, if we look at this from a strictly realistic viewpoint, there really are no reasons for anyone to be concerned other than the insurer whose claims manager made the comments, which are nothing more than baseless warnings and threats to their policyholder.

A Few Truths

Let’s review a few truths:

  • Licensed claims adjusters are supposedly trained and vetted to take on a position of public trust. This means that the individual has gone through sufficient training, testing and licensing (in most states) to represent the insurer and to properly assist the policyholder and/or claimant during the claims process. They are also bound and obligated to do so in a fair, ethical and unbiased manner where the rights of both parties are protected. In other words, claims people are expected to tell the truth and conduct themselves in a fair manner to the benefit of the insurer (employer) they represent and the policyholder who bought their insurance and is relying on them to see to it that their contractual obligations (promises) are honored.
  • Insurance policies are legal and binding contracts that clearly convey the obligations of the parties listed within them. Simply stated, this means that if you do this (i.e. pay your premium on time), we will do our part (as listed in the policy contract). Most insurance policies are known as adhesion contracts where the issuer makes all the promises and rules and the purchaser agrees to abide by them and pay the premiums for the coverage selected, with no negotiations. As in any contract, once an offer and acceptance have been met, the contract and all its obligations and duties are in force.

So, in this particular case, the consumer bought the insurer’s promises and, when they had a covered loss, they made a claim to acquire the benefits promised them to be indemnified and made whole. But now, the insurer, through their claims manager’s actions, is attempting to change and reduce their obligations and add caveats and restrictions to the promises the insurer made to their policyholder?


There’s nothing wrong with being “The Only One” if it’s for the right reasons!


As much as they might like to, insurers cannot change the rules in the middle of a claim any more than the policyholder can. If they wish to modify their policy, they have to do so through contractual modifications or endorsements, and it has to be accepted by the insured party before the issue arises.

Understanding this, let’s go through the message by the claims manager piece by piece to see it for what it is:

  • We have no problem inspecting your vehicle and working with ABC Body Shop. There are some items that you will want to discuss with (the shop’s owner) prior to having him start the estimate of repair. Policyholder’s response: There shouldn’t be a problem as the choice of repairer is the customer’s and the insurer has the right to inspect it or not. Please advise me, in writing, within 24 hours, if you wish to inspect my vehicle. If I do not hear from you within 24 hours, I will instruct my shop to proceed with my repair so as to avoid any unnecessary delays and related storage costs
  • Estimating fee – This will not be a fee paid by (insurer’s name). Policyholder’s response: Please provide me a copy of my policy where it states this repair-related cost is specifically excluded.
  • Storage – This will not be a fee paid unless the vehicle is deemed a total loss by (insurer’s name). Storage will be paid from the time the vehicle is deemed a total loss and not prior. This only comes into play if the vehicle damage is severe enough to deem the vehicle a total loss. Policyholder’s response: I’ve been assured that the only time this fee will be assessed is if and when the repairer is unable to proceed with the repair due to my failure to provide them direction to proceed with the repair. The only time that will happen is if and when I’m not provided what I’m entitled by your insurance company, so I would encourage you and your staff to respond to my repairer and me in an efficient and expeditious manner. Also, please provide me a copy of my policy where it states this loss-related expense is specifically excluded.
  • Cleaning of vehicle – This is a fee not paid by (insurer’s name). Policyholder’s response: Please provide me a copy of my policy where it states this repair-related cost is specifically excluded.
  • Cleaning of bay – This fee will not be paid by (insurer’s name). Policyholder’s response: Please provide me a copy of my policy where it states this repair-related cost is specifically excluded.
  • Disassembly of vehicle – Jeff will need to meet with (shop owner) and agree on the amount of disassembly needed to properly assess the damages. Policyholder’s response: Please provide me a copy of my policy where it states this repair-related cost is specifically excluded.

Summary

Unfortunately for repairers and consumers, it’s not uncommon for some insurers and/or claims people to lie to consumers in their ongoing efforts to mitigate and contain claims-related costs/expenses. It is rare, however, that insurers will do this in writing! Most claims people are smart enough to avoid making written statements that they know (or should know) are false and, in many instances, against the laws and regulations governing insurers’ conduct when handling claims.

We’ve all had experienced insurers acting in an egregious manner; however, not all repairers know how to combat it on behalf of their customers. The ability to recognize such issues and help your customers defend themselves against such conduct is an added advantage to a quality-oriented repairer. It’s knowledge like this that makes being “The Only One” a good thing for you, your community and your industry. There’s nothing wrong with being “The Only One” if it’s for the right reasons!

You May Also Like

Answering the Phone: Don’t Give Your Customers the Runaround

Do you give your front-office staff all the information they need so they don’t have to put a customer on hold or transfer them to someone else?

We’ve all had it happen to us before. You call a business and get a menu of options to address your issue or question: press 1 for ___ , press 2 for ___, etc. Sometimes we get disconnected, or we go to a person who says they are not the right person to talk to and they transfer you to the correct department, only to disconnect you again. It is so frustrating that you’re tempted to throw your $1,200 smartphone against the wall.

Diminished Value: The Secret to Glowing Online Reviews

Advising your clients to get diminished value compensation for their vehicles is one of the best ways to get positive online reviews and word-of-mouth business.

Customers: Empathy and Support Go a Long Way

Unexpected events happen every day, so be sure to give your customers patience, attention and support.

Insurers: How Low Will They Go?

If a shop doesn’t bend to an insurer’s mandates, they will often take the position of: if you’re not with us, then you’re against us.

Customer Relations: Is the Customer King in Your Body Shop?

In the day-to-day “busy-ness” of our jobs in the shop, we often forget who our true master is – especially because we serve many.

Other Posts
Vehicle Technology: The Ugly Truth About ADAS

The ugly truth about ADAS is that it is here to stay — and repairers will need to either embrace it or get into another line of business.

Auto Insurance Claims: Who Owes Whom?

Insurers don’t owe the repairer anything; insurers owe the vehicle owner, and the vehicle owner owes the repairer for the services rendered and received.

When Will OEM Referrals Replace DRP Referrals?

When will insurer DRPs end and car manufacturers dictate where the car gets repaired?

Auto Insurers and Total Losses

Is it legal for an insurance company to abandon the salvage of a vehicle they deemed a total loss?