Who Should Pay the Parts Restocking Fee After a Total? - BodyShop Business

Who Should Pay the Parts Restocking Fee After a Total?

Who is responsible for paying the parts restocking fee after a vehicle is totaled by an insurance company?

Who is responsible for paying the parts restocking fee after a vehicle is totaled by an insurance company?

First, we must define “parts restocking fee.” In my opinion, this is the fee a parts supplier would assess when parts are returned to them where they would need to provide a refund and return the parts back to stock or inventory. This is not to be confused with a “parts return fee,” which would be assessed by the repairer when the parts are found not to be needed due to several reasons such as:

1. The election was made to forego the use of “non-OEM aftermarket” parts and instead use OEM replacement parts.

2. A vehicle that was initially written to be repaired was subsequently deemed to be a total loss and the parts that were acquired to perform the repair are now no longer needed.

In either of these situations, it would likely be the insurer that called for the initial parts acquisition, and in doing so, the repairer was promised a “mark-up” or “earned profit” in return for their ordering, checking in, ensuring the parts were correct upon delivery, and paying for and protecting the parts while in their care, custody and control – and doing so until the parts are delivered with the repaired vehicle.

Generally, because the insurer erred in their assessment and then decided the parts they had originally called for are no longer needed, they will often request that the repairer return the parts for credit, and the repairer will provide these additional services. But all too often, repairers fail to assess a fair and reasonable fee for this valued service.

What is a “fair and reasonable fee” for the return of acquired parts? I tell repairers to determine and use realistic monetary values that are easy to substantiate and are comparable to other similar services so as to remove any dispute as to fairness.

So, when returning parts, because the parts return process is the exact reverse process of their acquisition, it makes perfect sense that the same reward (mark-up, profit, etc.) be earned as would have been earned when obtaining them. If a repairer earned $X to acquire the parts on behalf of their customer, then, on behalf of the customer, the repairer should earn the same amount for their return handling.

Who would owe for such fees? It would, of course, be the customer who signed the repair authorization. After all, it’s their vehicle, their parts and their legal responsibility to pay for the services rendered.

If insurance were involved, it would likely be the insurer that would wish to have the parts returned and thus they would have to pay their customer or pay the repairer on their customer’s behalf for this valued service.

Keep in mind that the return of the parts is merely an additional service that the repairer may or may not elect to provide to their customer.

Should the customer or insurer decline to provide advance payment for the parts return fee and/or parts restocking fee and await their refund (only after the repairer receives it), then the repairer can merely charge for the procured parts in full and allow the procured parts to leave with the vehicle. No harm, no foul! The insurer and/or customer will then, of course, be free to return the parts themselves to avoid such added charges.

My company, Auto Damage Experts, has a parts return policy that we provide the repairers we consult/coach which explains the additional parts handling service in detail, along with the basis for charges and available options. For more information, visit the Auto Damage Experts webpage.

You May Also Like

Utilizing Social Media Marketing for Your Auto Body Shop

When done effectively and consistently, social media can work wonders in connecting you to consumers.

According to our latest Industry Profile, 66% of you are over 50 years old, which means you didn’t grow up with social media. I fall squarely into that category too. So even though I see a lot of you on Facebook, we kind of don’t understand it, and some of us probably think it’s stupid. Maybe some of us were pressured into joining, maybe some of us actually enjoy espousing our political beliefs on there or sharing funny memes, while others maybe think it’s a great way to stay in touch with family and friends. 

Are ADAS Systems Actually Preventing Crashes?

Are there any organizations that are tracking if ADAS systems are actually preventing crashes?

When Will OEM Referrals Replace DRP Referrals?

When will insurer DRPs end and car manufacturers dictate where the car gets repaired?

Auto Insurers and Total Losses

Is it legal for an insurance company to abandon the salvage of a vehicle they deemed a total loss?

Are the Technician Shortage Tides Turning?

TechForce Foundation data shows that nearly 50,000 new automotive technicians joined the workforce in 2022, for a total of over 78,000 in two years.

Other Posts
Auto Insurance Fraud Works Both Ways

Unfortunately, for some insurers, fraud is becoming part of normal business practices.

Auto Body Shop Team-Building: What is Chemistry?

“Chemistry” is such a nebulous and mysterious concept that everyone struggles to put a finger on it.

Facebook Interest Groups: Down the Rabbit Hole We Go

I joined a Honda Civic 11th Gen Facebook group and quickly realized I was out of my element.

Collision Repairers: Take the Oath … Continued

Taking back the industry begins with collision repairers starting to work together for the benefit of both themselves and their customers.