Texas Jury Awards State Farm Policyholder $277,000

Texas Jury Awards State Farm Policyholder $277,000

A Rusk County District Court found that State Farm had knowingly or intentionally engaged in unfair and deceptive acts or practices regarding a policyholder's hail damage claim. 

Last month, a Texas jury gave State Farm a quarter million reasons to be a better neighbor to its policyholders when a Rusk County District Court found the insurance giant had knowingly or intentionally engaged in unfair and deceptive acts or practices in Joseph Wayne Collins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

“The jury determined that State Farm had unfairly withheld money owed from their policyholder’s settlement and knowingly engaged in wrongdoing,” said Burl Richards, owner of Burl’s Collision Center in Henderson, Texas — the policyholder’s chosen collision repair facility. “The jurors made a statement through their judgment: insurance companies need to take care of their policyholders.”

Collins’ journey to this judgment began in 2020, when he took his Toyota Tacoma pickup truck to Burl’s Collision Center to repair hail damage. After the auto body shop wrote its repair plan, State Farm declared the vehicle a total loss, despite the vehicle owner’s desire to have his truck repaired. Richards did not believe the damage exceeded 100% of the vehicle’s actual cash value (the threshold in Texas for a vehicle to be declared a total loss), so he recommended his client contact Robert McDorman at Auto Claim Specialists.

McDorman and the third-party appraiser hired by State Farm both agreed that the vehicle had been undervalued by the insurer.

“State Farm was taking advantage of our mutual client, their insured,” Richards said.

In the meantime, State Farm retrieved the Toyota Tacoma from Burl’s Collision Center, and although the insurer agreed to pay the total loss charges, they deducted the shop’s blueprint fees and several other line items, reducing the overall settlement paid to Collins by $1,750.

“Are blueprint fees necessary?” Richards asked. “I believe they’re necessary, the jury believed they’re necessary, and they believed the insurance company should not have deducted those fees from his settlement.

“State Farm said they weren’t going to make any deductions, but they did it anyway. The insurer elected to do the wrong thing every step of the way. They took $1,750 out of the client’s settlement, but the bigger error was that the vehicle should have been repaired as evidenced by the fact that the truck was sold at auction with a clear title. This whole thing could have been avoided if the vehicle had just been repaired in the first place like it should have been.” 

Collins hired an attorney to recoup his losses, and when the case was heard in the Fourth Judicial District Court of Rusk County, 10 of 12 jurors found that State Farm had failed to comply with its policy agreement. The insurer’s decision to knowingly and intentionally engage in unfair and deceptive practices carried a penalty of over $175,000 which, when combined with court fees and the original under-indemnification, resulted in a total judgment of $277,048 that State Farm was ordered to pay to Collins. 

Richards believes the judgment is a “big deal to us and our customer, but it’s not about the money; it’s about making change and hoping insurers will start treating people right. Mr. Collins felt like this was something he needed to pursue from a moral standpoint. It means a lot to have customers who are so passionate about doing the right thing and standing up against bullies like State Farm.” 

As not only a body shop owner but also the president of the Auto Body Association of Texas (ABAT), Richards shared another reason this judgment is so important.

“We constantly file complaints with the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) and tell them that insurance companies shouldn’t be making these types of deductions, but this issue has been going on for years. Each complaint yields the same generic letter that TDI doesn’t make these decisions; it’s up to a finder of fact to determine what’s fair and reasonable. Well, that’s exactly what happened here. A district judge and the jury — finders of fact — felt like this award was warranted. I feel really vindicated by their findings.” 

More details of this case can be found in an upcoming issue of ABAT’s official publication, Texas Automotive, published by Thomas Greco Publishing and available at grecopublishing.com.

You May Also Like

ASA Announces Support for Youth Apprenticeship Advancement Act

ASA believes the federal government can do more to encourage apprentice programs to ensure independent repair businesses have sufficient manpower.

The U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP), Subcommittee on Employment & Workplace Safety recently held a hearing to examine the value that youth apprenticeship programs provide to employers and the general public. The hearing also looked at the problems that inhibit the positive impact of these programs from realizing their full potential, and the extent to which S. 2363, the Youth Apprenticeship Advancement Act, could resolve those problems.

CIECA Announces National Calibration & Diagnostic Solutions as New Corporate Member

NCDS provides ADAS calibration tooling, OEM diagnostics, training and support to independent garages, dealership body shops and calibration businesses. 

SCRS Announces Candidates for 2024 Annual Election

On April 16, active SCRS members are invited to take part in the annual election for the SCRS board of directors.

Auto Care Association Applauds FTC, DOJ Comments on Right to Repair

The comments were in support of the renewal and expansion of exemptions facilitating consumers’ and businesses’ right to repair their own products.

Auto Care Association Launches REPAIR Act Video Campaign

In the new campaign, shop owners from across the U.S. share their stories on the increased challenges independent repair shops are facing with accessing repair data to service their customers’ vehicles.

Other Posts

AASP/NJ Mourns Loss of Board Member Sam Mikhail

Mikhail was an AASP/NJ Hall of Famer and served on the AASP/NJ board for decades.

SCRS Announces Podium as Newest Corporate Member

Podium provide solutions that allow collision repair centers to capitalize on messaging, customer feedback, online reviews, selling products and requesting payments.

WIN Announces 2024 Most Influential Women Award Recipients

The Most Influential Women awards honor women whose career achievements have enhanced the collision repair industry.

SCRS Announces Opti-Coat as Newest Corporate Member

SCRS has welcomed Opti-Coat, an industry leader in ceramic coatings and car care products, as their newest corporate member.