OEM, Aftermarket Debate Crash Part Patents at CIC - BodyShop Business

OEM, Aftermarket Debate Crash Part Patents at CIC

A lively debate at the recent Collision Industry Conference in Las Vegas had a former Keystone executive facing off with a Ford Motor Company attorney on crash part design patents and the new Access to Repair Parts Act (H.R. 3059/S. 1368) introduced to Congress in 2009 that would favor the aftermarket and create an exception from infringement of design patents for certain component parts used to repair another article of manufacture.

Dan Morrissey, former vice president of Keystone Automotive Services and current owner of New Horizon Advisors, LLC, accused Ford of trying to gain a monopoly over the sale of commonly used replacement crash parts by eliminating competition through seeking design patent protection. He cited a case that resulted in a win for Ford and a ban on the importation of seven different types of crash parts. A settlement was reached where LKQ, as the only distributor of non-OEM aftermarket copies of Ford collision parts protected by design patents, would pay Ford a royalty for each such part sold during the agreement’s term, which extends through Sept. 30, 2011.

“The impact was fewer choices and higher prices,” Morrissey said. “It was a resolution to the litigation but not a solution to the problem.”

Morrissey said Ford, as the sole source for select crash parts for 14 years (the duration of the design patents), now has the power to price gouge. To prove his point, he showed a graphic in his presentation where the prices for the parts Ford won protection over supposedly went up drastically and immediately after the court decision was handed down. Ford later disputed the information, with Paul Massey, Ford’s product marketing manager, saying the parts listed were “unfairly cherry picked.” Massey said without specific part numbers, the information was highly questionable.

Morrissey listed these other consequences of the court decision in favor of Ford:

• Lack of choice

• Higher parts prices = more total losses

• Increased consumer and insurance costs

• Fewer cars to repair

Benefits of competition he cited were:

• Faster delivery to shops

• Broader availability for older models

• Margin improvement

• OE price matching program

• Improved quality/certification programs

• Better warranties

Damian Procuri, an attorney with Ford’s intellectual property group, immediately went on the defensive and opened by saying, “Were there any job losses in the aftermarket or repair industry? The people we sued, LKQ, reported record profits. I hope Ford can someday.”

Procuri said Ford has pursued design patent protection because modern technology is making it much easier to clone parts.

“It takes thousands of hours to design fenders, hoods and lights,” Procuri said. “But now, high-speed laser scanners, rapid tooling and low-wage offshore manufacturing has made it faster, cheaper and more profitable to copy everything. The Taiwanese can clone our parts in under a day. And the copying of parts in every industry will continue to grow.”

Procuri said enforcing design patents is a 100-year-old concept and does not negatively impact the industry. He said inventors from the aftermarket also have the freedom to protect their patents. Other observations he made were:

• It’s always cheaper to make copies.

• The aftermarket copies the outside, not the inside.

• Insurers want copies, not customers.

• Consumers don’t know they’re getting copies.

• Insurance premiums are based on OE prices.

Addressing Morrissey’s point that aftermarket crash parts provide more choice in the market, Procuri said, “You don’t have to copy a Ford part to provide choice.”

The specific language of the Access to Repair Parts Act, which was introduced on June 25, 2009 and currently sits in committee, makes it not an act of infringement of any design patent to make, use, offer to sell, sell, or import into the United States any article that is a component part of another article, if the sole purpose of the component part is for the repair of the article of which it is a part so as to restore its original appearance.

“Three hundred thousand U.S. parts jobs have been lost since 2000, and Taiwanese parts have skyrocketed from 1989 to 2002,” Procuri said. “This bill would turbocharge that process. It is a clumsy attack on Detroit that will take down dozens of industries and jobs.”

More information:

ITC Sees Increase in Section 337 Patent Infringement Cases

Ford Files Design Patent Infringement Complaint on Mustang

Ford and LKQ Settle Patent Disputes

You May Also Like

Cruise Postpones Release of Driverless Taxi Service

Cruise, a GM subsidiary, recently announced that it will miss its goal of launching a large-scale self-driving taxi service in 2019.

Cruise, a GM subsidiary, recently announced that it will miss its goal of launching a large-scale self-driving taxi service in 2019. Cruise CEO Dan Ammann said the company plans to dramatically increase the number of its autonomous test vehicles on the road in San Francisco, but will not be offering rides to regular people this year, according to an article from The Verge.

Cutting Edge Automotive Solutions Partners with Andretti Rallycross

Andretti Rallycross announced that Cutting Edge Automotive Solutions will serve as technical partner on Cabot Bigham’s No. 02 OINK Clothing Beetle for the remainder of the 2019 Americas Rallycross season, showcasing their SP Tools USA brand.

Ford, Volkswagen Expand Collaboration to Include Autonomous, Electric Vehicles

Ford Motor Company and Volkswagen AG announced they are expanding their global alliance to include electric vehicles – and will collaborate with Argo AI to introduce autonomous vehicle technology in the U.S. and Europe.

CCAR Updates Website with More OSHA Alliance Resources

CCAR (Coordinating Committee For Automotive Repair) has announced the addition of new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Alliance content on its main website, www.ccar-greenlink.org.

CARSTAR McLaren Lake Forest and CARSTAR McLaren Irvine Open in California

Owned by husband-and-wife team James and Mary Davis, CARSTAR McLaren Lake Forest and CARSTAR McLaren Irvine are a family business.

Other Posts

CIECA to Offer Webinar on What Businesses Need to Know to Implement CIECA Standards

CIECA will hold its next CIECAst webinar, “Implementing CIECA Standards: Implementation Guide and Appendix C – BMS, Code Lists and Shema Components,” on Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2018 at 11 a.m. CST.

CARSTAR Urges Customers to Stay Winter Ready

Cold weather can create some of the harshest driving conditions of the year. The months between October and February top the list for accidents, vehicle damage and injuries.

CIECA Adds Broadly as Corporate Member

The Collision Industry Electronic Commerce Association (CIECA) announced that Broadly has joined CIECA as a corporate member.

NABR Launches BillableGenie Online Searchable Database of Insurer-Paid Not-Included Procedures

National AutoBody Research (NABR) has announced the launch of its BillableGenie online service, an independent, centralized source of actual data on insurer paid not-included procedures and operations, labor rates, labor rate concessions and other manually entered estimate line items.